
State Department report to Congress on effects on human health and safety of 
herbicides used in the Colombian aerial spray program, January 23, 2001 
Anexo que precisa el uso de dos coadyudantes: (COSMO FLUX-411F and COSMO-IN-D). El Cosmo 
Flux 411F
es producido por la
Empresa Cosmoagro de Colombia. 
Sobre el Cosmo-In-D hay aún menos información. 
Human Health and the 
Safety of Herbicides
Glyphosate is a non-selective herbicide. It is the active ingredient in 
several formulations that are sold under various tradenames throughout the 
world. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reregistered glyphosate as 
an active ingredient after review and evaluation of a large number of studies 
(more than 200) describing the human health and environmental fate and effects 
of glyphosate. Their evaluation determined that the use of glyphosate, as 
labeled for use in the U.S., is acceptable provided that the regulatory controls 
required by the EPA - the
labeled instructions - - are
followed. This September 1993 Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) 
determined the risks only for glyphosate, and its formulated products. Another 
reassessment by EPA in 2000 
of the available toxicology studies confirmed glyphosate's 
acceptability; as a result, additional uses on food crops were approved.
Formulated pesticide products usually contain chemicals other than the active 
ingredients to assure that the active ingredient performs in an effective manner 
at the appropriate concentration. The other chemicals in the formulated products 
are referred to as inert (other) ingredients, and they function as solvents, 
emulsifying agents, thickeners, carriers, or preservatives. The term inert means 
only that the ingredient is not performing an active pesticide function.
The EPA has developed several lists of chemicals that are approved for use as 
inert (other) ingredients in pesticide products. The inert ingredients approved 
for use in pesticide formulations used on food crops and on livestock animals 
are set forth in the Code of Federal Regulations (40 C.F.R. § 180.1001 (c), (d), 
and (e)). Each formulated product must be registered (or "licensed") with EPA 
before being offered for sale and use. As part of the process to obtain this 
registration, the formulator must submit a listing of the
chemicals used to make the product and a battery of chemistry and toxicity 
studies. EPA will not register a formulated product for use on food crops or 
animals unless (1) the active ingredient is registered, (2) all ingredients are 
granted tolerances of residues or exemption from the requirement of a tolerance 
as set forth in 40 C.F.R. 
§ 180.1001(c), (d), and (e), and (3) EPA makes a finding that the use of the 
product will not cause an unreasonable adverse effect to humans or the 
environment.
Two adjuvants (COSMO FLUX-411F
and COSMO-IN-D), the glyphosate product, and water are mixed together to make 
the spray solution. These two adjuvants are proprietary products that increase 
the effectiveness of the spray solution. It should be noted that EPA does not 
regulate adjuvants, as they are not pesticide products as defined by the Federal 
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. The seller of these adjuvants 
voluntarily provided the mixture ingredient lists with their Chemical Abstract 
Service (CAS) numbers for a review by the EPA. The EPA reviewed the lists of 
ingredients for the two adjuvants and determined that the ingredients in both 
adjuvants are listed in 40 CFR 180.1001. Therefore, both adjuvants are 
acceptable for use on food crops when the label instructions are followed.
Coca Aerial Eradication Chemicals
The Government of Colombia (GOC) attacks the coca crop primarily through 
aerial spraying using the herbicide glyphosate. The GOC has chosen to attack the coca crop primarily by 
spraying herbicides from the air rather than going into the fields and manually 
cutting down the crop for
cost, efficiency. and safety reasons. All of these reasons relate to Colombia's
coca crop
being:
o Enormous (122,500 
hectares) and expanding (having tripled in size since 
1993);
o Widely dispersed (ranging from southeast to southwest Colombia. and in the 
north); and 
o Concentrated increasingly in guerrilla-dominated areas.
It would be nearly impossible--tactically and financially--to match the pace and 
breadth of expansion by dispatching teams to eradicate the coca fields manually. It 
would be equally as difficult to protect these workers, or their security 
forces, from the certain and deadly violence that would escalate as they 
encountered hostile coca growers, insurgents and paramilitary forces protecting 
illicit fields. Herbicide application by airplane is the most cost-effective way 
of coping with the magnitude of the problem and ensuring that eradication 
operations do not turn violent. Spray programs can more quickly and easily 
adjust their operations to mitigate potential violence in the face of a likely 
confrontation with hostile growers and their defenders than can eradication 
teams on the ground.
We disagree with the perception that GOC uses extremely toxic chemicals in this 
operation and believe that switching to "less effective" chemicals would risk 
undermining the eradication effort and increasing coca cultivation, a move that 
would inevitably cause greater health and environmental damage to Colombia. 
Glyphosate is one of the most widely used agricultural herbicides in the world. 
It has been tested widely in the United States, Colombia, and elsewhere in the 
world. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved glyphosate for 
general use in 1974 and recertified it in September 1993. It is approved by EPA 
for use on cropland on which numerous crops are grown, forests, residential 
areas, and around aquatic areas. EPA has also established maximum residue limits 
(tolerances) of glyphosate in numerous food crops for human consumption. In the 
United States. 15-30 million pounds were used on 15-25 million acres annually in 
the 1990s; in 1997, approximately 51 million pounds were used. Glyphosate has 
been one of the top five pesticides, including herbicides, used in the U.S.
Glyphosate is used widely for many legal agricultural purposes in Colombia, 
including for weed control in fruit orchards and coffee plantations; for 
treating pre-seeded fields of rice, cotton, corn, sorghum, barley, and soybeans; 
and as a maturing agent for the production of sugar cane. Only ten percent of 
all the glyphosate used in Colombia is for coca eradication. In EPA's last 
comprehensive review of scientific studies on glyphosate, it concluded that 
proper use of glyphosate will not cause adverse effects in humans. Based on 
adequate scientific studies, glyphosate does not cause risks of concern for 
birth defects. mutagenic effects, neurotoxic effects, reproductive problems, or 
cancer. In June 1991, EPA classified glyphosate as non-carcinogenic for humans. 
based on adequate cancer studies. 
Human dietary exposures and risks are minimal. Exposure to workers wearing 
standard protective equipment is not expected to pose undue risks due to 
glyphosate's low acute toxicity; however, splashes of the product can cause 
transient irritation to skin and eyes. "Maibach (1986) evaluated [glyphosate] 
and commonly used household products (Johnson & Johnson baby shampoo. Ivory 
dishwashing detergent. and Pinesol liquid cleaner) for acute irritation, 
cumulative irritation, and photoirritation, as well as allergic and 
photoallergic activity... The authors concluded that [glyphosate] herbicide and 
the baby shampoo had less irritant potential than either the cleaner or 
dishwashing detergent. There was no difference between [glyphosate] and the baby 
shampoo in terms of irritation potential."1
Glyphosate bonds tightly with the soil before breaking down and is thus unlikely 
to leach through the soil to contaminate underground drinking water. It is one 
of the herbicides that EPA has approved for controlling weeds in aquatic 
environments. "The toxicity of glyphosate has been evaluated in combination with 
several surfactants and/or other herbicides in acute studies with rats and 
aquatic species. Based on the results of these studies, it is concluded that the 
simultaneous exposure of glyphosate and other materials does not produce a 
synergistic response."2 Glyphosate is not persistent in soil. It does not build 
up after repeated use and it is biologically degraded over time by soil 
microbes. 
Fields treated 
with glyphosate can be replanted immediately.
The coca 
spray mixture consists of water, glyphosate and the inert ingredients in the 
formulated product. and two other products also approved for use by the 
Colombian government--COSMO FLUX-411F
and COSMO-IN-D--to facilitate spraying. The two products are added along with 
the glyphosate formulated product and with water to complete the tank mixture 
for the spray solution. COSMO FLUX-411F
is a surfactant. It 
increases the herbicide penetration through the waxy layer of
the coca leaf by 
allowing more of the spray to stick to the plant. When more of the spray 
solution sticks to the plant, the herbicide becomes more effective which means 
it can be applied in smaller doses. COSMO-IN-D is an anti-foaming additive. It 
is used to minimize the foam created by the mixture-circulating pump inside the 
aircraft spray hopper. Without 
it, a vacuum could occur within the spray pressure pump, 
causing the spray system to shut down during flight. Surfactant and anti-foaming 
products, such as these, are commonly used in agricultural spray operations 
wound the world. COSMO-IN-D and COSMO FLUX-411F are produced in 
Colombia
and Colombia's 
Ministry of Health has classified them as toxicology Category IV -- lightly 
toxic. The EPA has determined that the ingredients in both are listed in 40 C.F.R. § 180.1001, and that 
they are acceptable for use on food products when the label instructions are 
followed.
1 Williams, C., Kroes, R., and Munro, I.
(2000). Safety Evaluation and Risk Assessment of the Herbicide Roundup and Its 
Active Ingredients. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 31, 117-165 (2000).
2 Ibid.
 
Attachment: 
Williams, C., Kroes, R., and Munro, I. (2000). 
Safety Evaluation and Risk Assessment of the Herbicide Roundup and Its Active 
Ingredients. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 31, 117-165 (2000). 
This document, a scientific journal article, is available at 
http://usfumigation.org/Restricted/Glyphosate&Humans-Monsanto_prop/index.htm